Product test
How much should a smartphone cost? No more than the Samsung Galaxy A34
by Jan Johannsen
Nokia X30 review – when sustainability is the selling point
31/1/2023
Translation: Veronica Bielawski
Nokia is trying to make the X30, its mid-range smartphone, palatable with sustainability. That’s commendable. But it’s also shady.
The X30 is Nokia’s current top-of-the-line smartphone. In the grand scheme of things, though, its specs make it a mid-range model – most notably its processor and number of cameras. The casing is made of recycled materials and the battery is supposed to be longer-lasting than is standard.
Recycled material doesn’t mean bad design
The 6.43-inch AMOLED display is protected with the robust Gorilla Glass Victus. It’s got a 2400 × 1080 resolution paired with a 90 hertz refresh rate and 450 nits of brightness. These aren’t top-notch specs, but the screen looks good and remains perfectly usable in sunlight. Compared to other smartphones, the display is very white and cool. However, you can tweak the settings and add either some yellow for more warmth or blue for an even cooler image.
The in-display fingerprint sensor is reliable and quick, but not the speediest of its kind. The Nokia X30 doesn’t offer face recognition, meaning your other options for unlocking the phone are a password, PIN or pattern.
Two cameras with low contrast and low zoom
On the back of the Nokia X30 are two cameras. That’s not many for a current smartphone but isn’t necessarily a disadvantage. Cheaper models in particular may include a third camera that’s often so bad as to be unusable. HMD Global opted for a 50-megapixel main camera and a 13-megapixel ultra-wide-angle camera. With that, the maximum zoom – 8x – is purely digital.
The Nokia X30’s limits become apparent in the case of very colourful shots. Compared to other phones, the colours look washed out. The result isn’t true to colour. I’m missing intensity. On the other hand, the level of detail is at least decent – sufficient that the writing on the stickers below is easily legible.
For comparison, here’s the same scene shot on the Pixel 7 Pro.
If the subject of the photo isn’t so vibrant, the X30’s colour reproduction is less of an issue. This becomes clear when looking at the Elbphilharmonie in Hamburg. I went ahead and also photographed it with the wide-angle camera as well as with zoom.
The wide-angle camera performs well and, most notably, is no worse than the main camera. Of course, it has room for improvement in terms of colour reproduction, but that’s another matter. The digital zoom still delivers usable images at 2x magnification. At max zoom, i.e. 8x magnification, the level of detail decreases significantly.
If you’re shooting at night, it’s worth using night mode. It brightens the image just a bit, mainly providing higher detail and therefore a clearer picture.
The front-facing camera gives you 16 megapixels and works very well even against the light. It could deliver a bit more vibrant colours, too, but the level of detail is high. Portrait mode, on the other hand, isn’t worth using; while the software does a neat job emphasising me against the blurred background, the border itself is a blurry line. It makes it look like there’s an aura emanating from my body.
Night mode is worth activating in the dark for the front-facing camera, too. It delivers much better quality, though it’s still far from outstanding. To be fair, even top-of-the-line smartphones struggle with nighttime selfies – something I most recently noticed on the Huawei Mate 50.
Usable power and a battery with a – presumably – long lifespan
The Nokia X30 is equipped with the Snapdragon 695, which has six gigabytes of working memory. This is perfectly sufficient for everyday use. Apps launch quickly enough, image data is processed with no problems and using the phone doesn’t feel jerky. High-end smartphones are a bit faster, though –
In the benchmark, even an over-two-year-old high-end model like the OnePlus 8T with Snapdragon 865 easily pulls ahead of the current-generation mid-range Nokia X30.
Another feature HMD Global uses to tout the sustainability of the Nokia X30 is its battery: it’s supposed to last 800 charging cycles instead of the typical 400 to 500. That sounds great, but I can’t test this over this short a time period.
Android One – ft. preinstalled apps for the first time
What this means for the X30 is that there’s still no information on when the update to Android 13 will be released. But come it should; HMD Global has promised updates up to Android 15, as well as security updates for three years.
I like the clean UI on Nokia phones. However, the X30 is the first time I’ve seen third-party apps preinstalled on a Nokia. Seven is still a manageable number compared to Huawei, but it’s a slippery slope for HMD Global. To make matters worse, you can’t uninstall the apps in the pop-up menu; you have to go into the app info to do that.
Verdict: sustainability alone isn’t enough
Here’s how I’d summarise the Nokia X30: exemplary chassis materials, decent display, good battery life, below-average camera, mediocre performance and initial software weaknesses. After weighing all the pros and cons, I say the Nokia X30 offers too little even for a mid-range smartphone.
I find it rather suspicious when the manufacturer starts touting sustainability as the selling point for its device. It’d seem better if there were other aspects to stress. Sustainability – here the use of recycled materials in the phone casing – should be a secondary point.
Header image: Jan Johannsen
Jan Johannsen
Senior Editor
Jan.Johannsen@galaxus.deWhen I was but a young student, I'd sit in my friend's living room with all my classmates and play on his SuperNES. Since then I've had the opportunity to test out all the newest technology for you. I've done reviews at Curved, Computer Bild and Netzwelt, and have now arrived at Galaxus.de.
