Your data. Your choice.

If you select «Essential cookies only», we’ll use cookies and similar technologies to collect information about your device and how you use our website. We need this information to allow you to log in securely and use basic functions such as the shopping cart.

By accepting all cookies, you’re allowing us to use this data to show you personalised offers, improve our website, and display targeted adverts on our website and on other websites or apps. Some data may also be shared with third parties and advertising partners as part of this process.

Background information

Interviewing a cybersecurity expert: «Compared to traditional tactics, cyber warfare is a sideshow»

Philipp Rüegg
11/3/2022
Translation: Patrik Stainbrook
Support: Luca Fontana

Cybersecurity expert at ETH Zurich Kevin Kohler is here to explain what cyber warfare is and what influence it has on the war in Ukraine.

The interview starts at 46 minutes and 55 seconds.

What’s cyber warfare?
It’s a controversial term in academic circles. The war in Ukraine certainly possesses a cyber aspect, which includes hacking attacks. But there are also many cyber activities that take place during peacetime. The cyberspace involves users based in NATO countries. Which is why you have to be careful when using the term war. It’s difficult to say at what point it’s cyber warfare and when it’s «just» a hack.

Which of these three dimensions is the most important?
Medially, the third is certainly the most popular because it has the greatest potential for escalation. So far, surprisingly little has occurred in this vein. In principle, Russia would have the capability for serious attacks and has demonstrated this in the past. So far, Western targets have got off lightly.

So far, Russia has refrained from grave cyberattacks on critical infrastructure.

How does this kind of government hacking look? Are they sitting in an open plan office somewhere, taking orders from the Trello board?
Interestingly, many actually have an office job. In this conflict, however, many independent groups are also involved. There are fewer clear hierarchies there.

What Anonymous is doing won’t decide the war.

I assume this threshold is probably always just high enough to avoid countries from actively intervening in the war?
It’s not clear where this line lies. If it’s just a single cyberattack, it’d need a real-life effect. Something would need to be destroyed. Which would be possible, for example, by overloading a power grid. As smaller attacks have always occurred in the past, this threshold slowly started to be met in 2021.

We’ve only talked about attacks so far. Are there also peacemaking cyber measures?
By spreading facts, propaganda can be limited. There are also dialogue formats used to ease communication between states. And the same means used for espionage activities can also be used to bring about a cease-fire. As an individual, however, this is certainly more difficult than joining common attacks.

The whole interview is available in the newest episode of the digitec podcast.

33 people like this article


User Avatar
User Avatar

As a child, I wasn't allowed to have any consoles. It was only with the arrival of the family's 486 PC that the magical world of gaming opened up to me. Today, I'm overcompensating accordingly. Only a lack of time and money prevents me from trying out every game there is and decorating my shelf with rare retro consoles. 


Background information

Interesting facts about products, behind-the-scenes looks at manufacturers and deep-dives on interesting people.

Show all

These articles might also interest you

  • Background information

    Zuckerberg on Rogan podcast: I endured a three-hour interview so you don’t have to

    by Samuel Buchmann

  • Background information

    Star Wars Outlaws: lively roguish adventure instead of Jedi drama

    by Philipp Rüegg

  • Background information

    Interview with Daniel Lutz: Swiss game developer based in Montreal

    by Philipp Rüegg