Your data. Your choice.

If you select «Essential cookies only», we’ll use cookies and similar technologies to collect information about your device and how you use our website. We need this information to allow you to log in securely and use basic functions such as the shopping cart.

By accepting all cookies, you’re allowing us to use this data to show you personalised offers, improve our website, and display targeted adverts on our website and on other websites or apps. Some data may also be shared with third parties and advertising partners as part of this process.

Shutterstock
News + Trends

Court judgement: Google may keep Chrome

Samuel Buchmann
3/9/2025
Translation: machine translated

In future, the search engine giant will have to share certain user statistics with its competitors. However, Google does not have to sell its own browser. The billion-euro deal with Apple also remains authorised.

A US federal court has ruled that Google can keep its Chrome browser and Android operating system. The demanded break-up of the company will not materialise. The judgement follows the finding that Google has a search engine monopoly and has illegally secured this with exclusive distribution agreements.

Judge Amit Mehta has ruled that the requested measures go too far. Instead, he ordered other conditions: Google must share certain search data with competitors on a one-off basis. This includes index and interaction data. This will give competitors such as Microsoft Bing, DuckDuckGo, OpenAI and Perplexity the opportunity to improve their own search services. The data will be provided at standard market prices.

20 billion deal with Apple still permitted

The judgement is seen by analysts as a success for Google and Apple. The shares of both companies rose significantly after the decision. Critical voices criticise that the measures are not sufficient to break Google's monopoly.

The effects of artificial intelligence (AI) were also addressed in the proceedings. AI-supported search services such as OpenAI and Perplexity are entering the market with new approaches. Judge Mehta cites this development as a reason for his reluctance: market conditions are changing and new suppliers have a good chance of competing with Google.

Google wants to appeal the judgement

The judgement could serve as a blueprint for future proceedings against other tech giants such as Meta, Amazon and Apple. The US government has already filed further antitrust lawsuits, including in the area of online advertising, where Google has also been categorised as a monopolist.

Header image: Shutterstock

19 people like this article


User Avatar
User Avatar

My fingerprint often changes so drastically that my MacBook doesn't recognise it anymore. The reason? If I'm not clinging to a monitor or camera, I'm probably clinging to a rockface by the tips of my fingers.


News + Trends

From the latest iPhone to the return of 80s fashion. The editorial team will help you make sense of it all.

Show all