Your data. Your choice.

If you select «Essential cookies only», we’ll use cookies and similar technologies to collect information about your device and how you use our website. We need this information to allow you to log in securely and use basic functions such as the shopping cart.

By accepting all cookies, you’re allowing us to use this data to show you personalised offers, improve our website, and display targeted adverts on our website and on other websites or apps. Some data may also be shared with third parties and advertising partners as part of this process.

Background information

Bye-bye rooster! You’re cock-a-doodle-doing our neighbours’ heads in

Patrick Vogt
25/1/2024
Translation: Jessica Johnson-Ferguson

Our second attempt at introducing a rooster to the family is over. We hatched Henry, raised him by hand ... and finally gave him away with a heavy heart. Some of our neighbours just didn’t appreciate him as much as we did.

We live in the greater Zurich area. Out in the sticks, some might say. In any case, it’s all pretty rural around here. Which is one of the reasons why we got chickens a few years ago.

The point of contention

Ruler of the roost

The complaint

Six o’clock?! Was that even possible? Neither my wife nor I had ever heard our rooster crow this early. Probably because I’m usually already out or still asleep at that time of day. A few days later, I heard him with my own ears. It was early and I could hear him through the closed stable doors. It was just after six, to be exact.

The consequence

I kept the promise I made to the complainant and peace has returned to the neighbourhood. Quite literally. There was no trip to the council for him or us. Henry the rooster is now back where he came from when he was still an egg. Now, he can crow whenever and as often as he likes.

The legal situation

Perhaps we could and should have fought more for Henry. Talking sense into the rooster probably wouldn’t have helped. But we could’ve made the barn soundproof. A possible solution that does raise the question of cost and return.

We could have put up a fight and, at worst, ended up in a legal dispute ... which we might’ve lost. Even the Federal Supreme Court has had to rule on unwelcome cockcrowing. In 1996, it ruled in favour of the neighbours disturbed by the noise in a very similar case (link in German) that took place in Winterthur.

One thing is clear: «Night-time noise restrictions apply from 10 p.m. to 7 a.m.,» state the police regulations of our municipality. And furthermore: «Animals must be kept in such a way that no one is inconvenienced and neither people, animals
nor property is at risk or damaged.» My conclusion after all this? If someone’s sleep is bothered because of our rooster, it’s up to us to act as the owners. And so we did. To keep the peace.

Header image: Sofia Vogt

32 people like this article


User Avatar
User Avatar

I'm a full-blooded dad and husband, part-time nerd and chicken farmer, cat tamer and animal lover. I would like to know everything and yet I know nothing. I know even less, but I learn something new every day. What I am good at is dealing with words, spoken and written. And I get to prove that here. 


Background information

Interesting facts about products, behind-the-scenes looks at manufacturers and deep-dives on interesting people.

Show all

These articles might also interest you

  • Background information

    The new school year’s knocking our old routines out of whack

    by Michael Restin

  • Background information

    Forget Labubu, check out my daughter’s Legami pens

    by Patrick Vogt

  • Background information

    Van life with a dog: freedom or stress on four wheels?

    by Darina Schweizer