Your data. Your choice.

If you select «Essential cookies only», we’ll use cookies and similar technologies to collect information about your device and how you use our website. We need this information to allow you to log in securely and use basic functions such as the shopping cart.

By accepting all cookies, you’re allowing us to use this data to show you personalised offers, improve our website, and display targeted adverts on our website and on other websites or apps. Some data may also be shared with third parties and advertising partners as part of this process.

Opinion

Apple’s Vision Pro just isn’t visionary

Samuel Buchmann
6/6/2023
Translation: Patrik Stainbrook

The cat’s out of the bag – Apple has announced its first augmented reality headset. It’s technically impressive, but seems aimless to me.

Why? That’s what I ask myself whenever I encounter virtual reality. I was hoping Apple could finally offer an answer – the company that convinced countless customers why they should buy a PC. Or smartphone. Or tablet. Or a watch with a screen.

I hoped that Apple would be just as eye-opening as to why I need Virtual (VR) or Augmented Reality (AR) in my life. CEO Tim Cook has been raving about it for ages. Yesterday, at the World Wide Developers Conference, he finally presented Apple’s entry into the futuristic product category. The Vision Pro is the Californian’s first headset.

Technically, the device is a masterpiece by all accounts: powerful and with many times the pixel density of other headsets. Besides that, Apple also remembers other important design factors like individual fit and good solutions for eyeglasses. Awesome. Its price is accordingly astronomical. 3,500 dollars. Don’t care, pioneering products can be expensive.

A new kind of screen – so?

It’s just lacking vision. What problem will such a device solve? At the end of the day, Tim Cook and his Vice Presidents of Whatever didn’t provide me with a satisfactory answer. I ask again: why? Most of the usage cases came down to the same thing – the Vision Pro projects a large screen into my room. Cool, but I already have something similar. It’s called a monitor or a TV.

In the end, it’s something I’ll have to put on my head. A restriction on my physical freedom.

Whether I’m supposed to marvel at panoramic photos, watch movies or work on it, I can already do all that today. Gesture control à la Minority Report is certainly elegant and well implemented – but mice, keyboards and remotes will remain more effective in many cases. It also doesn’t matter how well Apple cushions and adjusts the Vision Pro to my face. Again, it’s something I’ll have to wear on my head. Restricting my physical freedom.

I hope I’m wrong

.

Is this really enough? I doubt it. I hope I’m wrong. I hope a compelling vision will manifest itself out of nowhere as soon as Apple unleashes developers onto the new platform. I’m hoping for a lightbulb moment when I put on a Vision Pro for the first time. And above all, that it doesn’t gather dust in a corner after the initial thrill. It’s too expensive for that.

245 people like this article


User Avatar
User Avatar

My fingerprint often changes so drastically that my MacBook doesn't recognise it anymore. The reason? If I'm not clinging to a monitor or camera, I'm probably clinging to a rockface by the tips of my fingers.


Opinion

This is a subjective opinion of the editorial team. It doesn't necessarily reflect the position of the company.

Show all

These articles might also interest you

  • Opinion

    Steve Jobs tells me about Vision Pro

    by Samuel Buchmann

  • Background information

    Apple’s mixed reality headset threatens to flop

    by Samuel Buchmann

  • Background information

    Meta Quest 3S review – the VR headset for everyone

    by Philipp Rüegg