Hello, when comparing photos for acacia vs sheesham (140cm version) I found something weird. Some photos eg. 5th picture for both (sheesham and acacia) have exactly the same wood structure (growth rings etc.) except for color tone. I thought that both tables are from massive wood - no thin veneers or lamino, but then of course both tables shoud differ in growth rings. Can you please clear this for me. It seems to me that you are showing just some 3d models, not the real thing. Or photoshop manipulation (lets take a photo of sheesham table and instead of taking photo of acacia table just make sheesham table a little brighter). I am just guessing, but thats how these photos could get interpreted. In case these tables are masive could you please provide photos of actual tables. Thank you for explaining the matter.